15 hours ago
2
ARTICLE AD BOX
Gone are the days where companies could release sophisticated software across swathes of the world, unmolested by regulatory concerns. Now, diverse AI regulations are forcing companies to think differently about software design. (Image: Shutterstock)
As the EU races to finalise the world’s most comprehensive AI act, the US is taking a decentralised state-by-state approach – now complicated by a proposed federal moratorium on local enforcement. Meanwhile, Asia’s lighter, more flexible frameworks in countries like Japan and Singapore are pulling in a different direction altogether.
There’s no universal rulebook. For global enterprises, the ground is shifting faster than they can build. Each market draws its own red lines, forcing companies to make tough choices: slow down innovation to comply with the strictest standards or risk costly regulatory missteps elsewhere. The consequence is a fractured landscape that is rapidly becoming one of the most complex strategic challenges for international businesses today.
The new risk equation
Faced with a regulatory map that changes at every border, global enterprises are being forced into a delicate balancing act. Move too fast and they risk building products that fall foul of new laws, but move too slowly and they risk losing ground to more agile competitors. For many, the traditional playbook of design, build and launch globally cannot hold up.
What’s emerging is instead a new and often uncomfortable risk equation. In the past, businesses could tolerate some degree of legal grey area in favour of speed, especially in the early years of AI innovation. But with penalties like the EU threatening to bite hard and the US starting to enforce their own rules, the margin for error is disappearing.
Some organisations are now not just rethinking how they can build but where they launch first. Markets like Singapore are becoming low-friction entry points, supported by schemes that actively encourage innovation and foreign investment. Other regions, on the other hand, are being treated with heightened caution. The era of global AI rollouts, at least for now, is on pause.
Uniformity to localisation
The days for building AI products for uniform, global release are fast fading. And in response to the patchwork of emerging regulations, leading enterprises are now designing for localisation from the ground up. The goal here is flexibility and compliance.
Rather than rolling out identical AI features in every market, companies are building configurable solutions that can adapt to local rules. Stacks are designed with capabilities in mind that can be switched on or off depending on the region, enabling teams to tailor their products without starting from scratch.
The shift goes deeper than product toggles. Compliance by design is gaining momentum with legal and regulatory considerations embedded into product development from day one. This is so different from the first iterations of AI product design, where it was only addressed just before launch.
Global rollout strategies are also evolving. Many organisations are sequencing launches, favouring regions with clearer regulatory frameworks and delaying entry into more complex markets. This is the new reality for AI as localisation, flexibility and regulatory foresight is baked in from the start.
Future-proofing for what comes next
Navigating the AI regulatory maze is also fast becoming a leadership challenge. The organisations that will thrive in this fractured global environment are rethinking how their teams collaborate, how they monitor risk, and how they build long-term resilience into their AI strategies.
Collaboration across functions – legal, product, data, ethics, and executive teams – is no longer optional and teams have to work more closely than ever, not just to interpret today’s rules but to anticipate tomorrow’s.
Importantly, businesses are beginning to shift their innovation pipelines. Rather than building to the minimum requirements of today’s frameworks, they’re designing for the future by baking in flexibility that can withstand the next wave of regulation.
Innovating through uncertainty as to global AI regulations
The AI regulatory landscape isn’t a fixed playing field. It’s more like shifting tectonic plates, with the ground constantly moving beneath global enterprises, sometimes gradually, sometimes with sudden, seismic jolts.
Businesses that try to anchor themselves with rigid, unyielding structures are leaving themselves exposed. When the ground inevitably shifts again, they’ll struggle to keep up. The ones that will endure are building on flexible foundations: systems designed to bend, absorb shocks, and adapt quickly to whatever pressures come next.
Jane Smith is the field chief data and AI officer for EMEA at ThoughtSpot
